@Article{MaruSmiSpaPinDub:2014:LiVuRe,
author = "Maru, Yiheyis Taddele and Smith, Mark Stafford and Sparrow, Ashley
and Pinho, Patricia Fernanda do and Dube, Opha Pauline",
affiliation = "{CSIRO Climate Adaptation Flagship} and {CSIRO Climate Adaptation
Flagship} and {CSIRO Climate Adaptation Flagship} and {Instituto
Nacional de Pesquisas Espaciais (INPE)} and {University of
Botswana}",
title = "A linked vulnerability and resilience framework for adaptation
pathways in remote disadvantaged communities",
journal = "Global Environmental Change",
year = "2014",
volume = "17",
number = "01",
pages = "1",
note = "Supplementary data associated with this article can be found, in
and the online version, at doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2013.12.007.",
keywords = "vulnerability resilience, adaptive capacity, remoteness,
marginalization, adaptation pathways.",
abstract = "We develop a systems framework for exploring adaptation pathways
to climate change among people in remote and marginalized regions.
The framework builds on two common and seemingly paradoxical
narratives about people in remote regions. The first is
recognition that people in remote regions demonstrate significant
resilience to climate and resource variability, and may therefore
be among the best equipped to adapt to climate change. The second
narrative is that many people in remote regions are chronically
disadvantaged and therefore are among the most vulnerable to
climate change impacts. These narratives, taken in isolation and
in extremis, can have significant maladaptive policy and practice
implications. From a systems perspective, both narratives may be
valid, because they form elements of latent and dominant feedback
loops that require articulation for a nuanced understanding of
vulnerability-reducing and resilience-building responses in a
joint framework. Through literature review and community
engagement across three remote regions on different continents, we
test the potential of the framework to assist dialogue about
adaptation pathways in remote marginalized communities. In an
adaptation pathway view, short-term responses to vulnerability can
risk locking in a pathway that increases specific resilience but
creates greater vulnerability in the long-term. Equally,
longer-term actions towards increasing desirable forms of
resilience need to take account of short-term realities to respond
to acute and multiple needs of marginalized remote communities.
The framework was useful in uniting vulnerability and resilience
narratives, and broadening the scope for adaptation policy and
action on adaptation pathways for remote regions.",
doi = "10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2013.12.007",
url = "http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2013.12.007",
issn = "0959-3780",
label = "lattes: 8472077797118798 4 MaruStaSpaPinDub:2014:LiVuRe",
language = "en",
targetfile = "1-s2.0-S0959378013002379-main.pdf",
url = "http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2013.12.007",
urlaccessdate = "27 abr. 2024"
}